Faith & Politics Not Church & State

Welcome to a discussion of the role religion plays in the course of our elections. I draw your attention back to the Saddleback Church led by Rick Warren (author The Purpose Driven Life) when he hosted the two presidential candidates at his church for a time of questions and answers. It was extremely civil and that was one of the objectives Pastor Warren wanted to achieve with his event. Another objectives was to get some straight answers to some direct faith based questions. I believe he accomplish this objective as well.

However, the debate about President Jefferson's famous words regarding the Establishment Clause remains active today. Since the IRS under the instruction of LBJ introduced policy that would hinder the content of sermons made from the pulpits of America's churches, the involvement of the people of faith in the political process dwindled.

Pioneers such as Jerry Falwell and James Dobson began to give evangelical christians a voice into the political process but it seems to me most clergy are reluctant to enter the cultural war that rages on today's political battleground.

Is it fear of their non profit status and the IRS? Watchdog groups like belief.net that monitor the 'spiritual speak' in the political arena? or could it be an acceptance that if something is said long enough and loud enough eventually it becomes true? Re: separation of church and state

Sad, because in few places other than the political process can a pastor or a christian make their impact felt greater than by entering the rough and tumble world of politics.

After all, what's that scripture about SALT and LIGHT?

Friday, March 19, 2010

Too Simple To Be This Complicated

The Healthcare debate is about to move us in a direction philosophically that I believe is contrary to the DNA of the American spirit. Socialism is a failed experiment and if you want to see socialism in its worst form, visit a Canadian hospital or European country for an extended time and talk to the people. However, there is little time today to discuss how the philosophical affects the practical.

Today, we must discuss the simple. This is my solution to this impending Healthcare Nightmare. Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on the number of people who are without healthcare in this country. Dems state there are 40+ million of us who are without HC. I do not think it is that high. Repubs have stated there are as few as 10 million.

Whether we are discussing life, politics, theology or philosophy, the truth normally lies somewhere in the middle of the two extremes. In regard to the uninsured, I am going with the number 17-19 million Americans.

I do not have time to write, nor do you have time to read, the breakdown of those 17-19 million. Who are they? Where are they? and Why do they not have insurance? These are all reasonable questions. There are approximately 300 million Americans. You do the math.

Ok, here is my solution. Instead of upsetting the best medical care in the world, instead of upsetting 1/6 of our economy (possibly without a vote), instead of directing our future toward an already failed socialistic doctrine, instead of handicapping our doctors and researchers, instead of violating my individual right to choose, federally fund abortion and cause upheaval for the vast majority of us who have health care, why don’t we simply take care of the 17-19 million Americans and provide healthcare for them? If we took care of them half as well as we take care of every country in the world that has a disaster, aka Haiti and Chile, then our people would be well care for indeed.

The programs and processes are already in place to do this on a state level and with federal funding, states would be able to manage the care of their own poor. I am all for helping the poor, I’ve done it both here and overseas, but there is more at stake here than just healthcare, this is a step toward what a few believe is best for the rest of us. Healthcare is a means to an end. The end of the pioneer spirit of America and a giant step toward socialism for masses.

1 comment:

  1. That is such a good point.. We do so much good for other countries and we are still in a recession. I think on one hand, it could be like that story in the bible about the rich man who gave a little and the poor woman who gave all she had for the offering.. but i think we should rethink where the offering is going. I am not against raising money when countries have natural disasters.. I am saying I am about to lose my home and cannot hardly feel my children.
    I guess I didn't have another hand.

    ReplyDelete